Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2009 YLR 1140

ABDUL KARIM vs THE STATE

Citation2009 YLR 1140
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Revision Application No,S-62 of 2006
Date2006-07-20
Judge(s)Sajjad Ali Shah
ResultPetition allowed

ORDER

1. ' SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J.---Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after having been granted interim bail by the learned Sessions Judge Mithi, the applicant/ accused could not attend the Court on one date and submitted application for condonation of his absence. However, the reasons given in the application did not prevail with the learned Sessions Judge who was pleased to not only reject the said application but also dismissed his bail application in non-prosecution and non-bailable warrants were issued. The learned counsel has submitted that the absence of the accused before the trial Court was beyond his control and he has undertaken to appear before the trial Court henceforth on each and every date of hearing.

2. ' The learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection if the non- A bailable warrants issued are suspended and his bail application is restored to its original position.

3. ' In the circumstances, the present revisions application is allowed. The non-bailable warrants issued against the applicant/accused are recalled and his bail application is resorted to its original position and the learned Sessions Judge is directed to decide his bail application on merits.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch