Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2008 MLD 1552

SAEEDULLAH and another vs THE STATE and another

Citation2008 MLD 1552
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Petition No. 69 of 2008
Date2008-05-14
Judge(s)Muhammad Alam Khan
ResultBail granted

' MUHAMMAD ALAM KHAN, J.---This is an application for bail filed by the accused/petitioners Saeedullah and Zaman, sons of Zakim Khan in case F.I.R. No.31, dated 27-2-2008 of Police Station Paroa, District D.I. Khan, initially registered under sections 457/380, P.P.C. With subsequently added section 411, P.P.C., as their efforts for the same relief have been proved abortive before the learned lower Courts vide orders, dated 7-3-2008 and 13-3-2008 respectively.

2. According to the' F.I.R. Lodged by the complainant Hafeezullah Khan on 27-2-2008 at 1110 hours, on the last night he along with his children were asleep in the house while the cattle were tied in the cattle room. When he woke up in the evening, he saw the door of the cattle room opened and on entering there found missing a buffalo of black colour and oxe of a white colour, both valuing ninety thousands, but none was charged for the offence. However, subsequently during the investigation of the case, the accused/petitioners were booked for the offence who after their arrest applied for bail but could not succeed in the lower fora and hence this petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the available record.

4. From perusal of the available record it reveals that prima facie, the accused/petitioners at the most, could be booked for an offence under section 411, P.P.C., the punishment wherefor provided under the law is not hit by the prohibition contained under section 497, Cr.P.C. And is bailable.

Similarly, it is not the principle of law that the maximum sentence provided for an offence should be kept in mind while granting bail to the accused if the Court on the data discernable from the record comes to the conclusion that no maximum punishment could be awarded to the accused/petitioner, the concession of bail could be extended to him in the given circumstances.

Thus while tentatively assessing the case of the accused/petitioners, it goes out of the embargo contained under section 497, Cr.P.C. And is held to be of further inquiry.

5. Consequently, the application is accepted and the accused/petitioners are directed to be released on bail provided they furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (Rs. One lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Ilaqa/Judicial Magistrate, who shall ensure that the sureties are local, reliable and men of means. Above are the reasons for my short order of even date.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch