' SAIYED SAEED ASHHAD, J.--- Rana M. Shamim Advocate Supreme Court for respondent No,1 requests for adjournment on the ground that for the last 3 to 4 days he is not feeling well and could not prepare brief.
2. Mr. Aziz A. Munshi while not opposing the adjournment drew our attention to the case of Muhammad Yousaf and others v. Mst. Najma Bibi and others PLD 2006 SC 512 wherein a Bench of this Court on similar facts and circumstances granted leave to appeal to examine the question whether a revision petition dismissed in default can be restored and in suit eventuality whether the provisions contained in Article 181 of the Limitation Act would be applicable and requested that leave to appeal may also be granted in these petitions and the same may be ordered to be clubbed with appeals arising out of Civil Petitions Nos.83, 84 and 1499 of 2005.
3. Rana M. Shamim has no objection to the grant of leave.
4. Accordingly leave to appeal is granted in these petitions. The office is directed to club the appeals arising out of these petitions with the appeals which have arisen out of Civil Petitions Nos.83, 84 and 1499 of 2005 referred to above.
C.M.A. No,41-K of 2005. Notice to respondents. Till then proceedings before the High Court shall remain suspended.