Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Karachi) 529

MUHAMMAD ARIF BAIG vs STATE

CitationPLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Karachi) 529
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Cr. Bail Appl No, 688 of 2007
Date2007-10-02
Judge(s)Qaiser Iqbal
ResultBail admitted

ORDER

1. Applicant Muhammad Arif Baig son of Saeed Baig, has applied for post-arrest bail in Crime No, 230/2006, under Section 4/5 of Explosive Act registered at P.S. Pak Colony. Karachi.

2. Succinctly, facts leading to the case are that applicant was arrested on 9.12.2006 after police encounter, one hand-grenade was recovered from his possession in presence of Head Constable Muhammad Hussain and Police Constable Ali Dost. Consequent thereupon, F.I.R. 'No, 229/06, under Section 353/324/34 P.P.C. was registered beside F.I.R. No, 230/2006 under Section 4/5 of Explosive Act, upon completion of the investigation, the applicant was sent up to face trial.

3. Mr. Muhammad Akbar Awan, learned counsel has contended that the applicant has been admitted on bail in Crime No 229/06., whereas the present F.I.R. is outshoot of the main case. It is urged that no evidence is available to connect the applicant as subverter or saboteur nor expert report is available on police file. It is urged that in the absence of the report of Bomb Disposal Inspector to the effect whether the hand-grenade was in serviceable condition or not, case against the applicant requires further inquiry as contemplated by sub-section 2 of Section 497 Cr.P.C.

4. Miss. Afsheen Aman, has vehemently opposed the plea raised on behalf of the applicant, contended that the applicant is not entitled to concession of bail.

5. It transpires that the applicant was enlarged on bail in the main case, present case is outshoot of the Crime No, 229/06, it also transpires that hand-grenade secured from possession of the applicant was examined by Bomb Disposal Inspector, his report is not available on record to suggest whether the same was in serviceable condition or not. Applicant is behind the bar from the last nineteenth months even charge has not been framed by the trial Court nor there is any likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future.

6. In view of the above, facts and circumstances, applicant Muhammad Arif is hereby admitted on bail, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs, 50,000/- (Rupees: fifty Thousand only) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch