' SYED SHABBAR RAZA RIZVI, J.---Mst. Fazeelat has been recovered and she states that she does not recognize petitioner her husband. She further states that she was forcibly taken away to Chiniot by petitioner, where her thumb-impressions were obtained on blank papers. She also states that she wants to go with her parents.
2. Proceedings under Article 199 of the Constitution to be read with section 491, Cr.P.C. Are of summary nature, therefore, this Court cannot enter into recording of evidence in constitutional jurisdiction.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner requests that Mst. Fazeelat be asked to have a meeting with petitioner Muhammad Ali for the minutes. This was suggested to Mst. Fazeelat but she refused to have a meeting with petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner also insisted that she is a wedded wife of the petitioner, therefore, she may be asked to have a meeting.
4. As recorded above, this Court cannot enter into a detailed inquiry or recording of evidence in such matter while exercising its constitutional jurisdiction to be read with section 491, Cr.P.C.
Therefore, parties may resort to concerned Courts under relevant provisions of law.
5. In view of the statement of Mst. Fazeelat, this writ petition is disposed of with the above observations. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.