' The petitioner is aggrieved by order, dated 15-3-2007 whereby his constitutional petition has been disposed of by the Sindh High Court with the direction to the trial Court to decide his two applications one under sections 12 and 13 of the NAB Ordinance, 1999 and another under sections 523 and 516-A, Cr.P.C. Read with section 12 of the NAB Ordinance expeditiously if proceedings before the trial Court are not stayed by this Court.
2. Mr. Jatoi states that this Court in C.P.L.A. No,326 of 2005 vide order, dated 27-3-2007 has stayed proceedings before the trial Court till the final disposal of the appeal arising out of the judgment, dated 25-4-2004 passed by the High Court.
3. It may be observed that the impugned order was passed by consent of the parties and, prima facie, it loses its efficacy in view of the order passed in the C.P.L.A. By a Bench of this Court, It is not the case of petitioner that the property of petitioner is being disposed of pending the hearing of her petition before this Court. Therefore, no live issue is left in the field for adjudication by this Court after the order of this Court, dated 27-3-2007. In case petitioner feels aggrieved by the said order it is open to her to seek her remedy before the proper forum of law.
4. In our considered opinion no question of law of public importance has been made out in this petition which is accordingly dismissed and . revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.