1. MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J. - Mr Muhammad Atif Amin, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions of his client, states that he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside, but for securing ' the rights of the respondent/plaintiff, it is submitted that the properties in question, the list whereof has been filed by the appellant, should not be allowed to be alienated in any manner whatsoever, during the pendency of the suit. This is acceptable to the learned counsel for the appellant, who states that the appellant shall not alienate the suit properties. Besides the above, this Court i^also of the view that in order to ensure the ends of justice, the appellant, if has not so far provided, shall provide the details of the profits/rental etc, which he was been deriving from the properties in question, to the learned Trial Court within a period of two months. The appellant shall also file a security with the Court below that in case the respondent ultimately is found to be entitled to any share in the rental/profits, that shall be paid to her, subject to the decision of the Court in this behalf. The learned Trial Court is also directed to decide this case by the end of the year 2007 Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of.