Pakistan Case Law← Search
2008 CLC 644

Messrs NISHAN ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED through Director vs BAHAUDDIN

Citation2008 CLC 644
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petition No,525 of 2008
Date2008-02-22
Judge(s)Syed Hamid Ali Shah
ResultOrder Accoordingly.

ORDER

' SYED HAMID ALI SHAH, J.--- When confronted that instant petition has been invoked in respect of contractual obligations, which involve factual controversy, learned counsel concedes. He has, however, submitted that there are certain contracts, which are in pipeline and if the petitioner is blacklisted or coercive measures are taken against him, he will suffer irreparable loss. While placing reliance on the case of Salahuddin and 2 others v. Frontier Sugar Mills and Distillery Ltd., Takht Bhai and 10 others PLD 1975 SC 244, learned counsel has submitted that alternate remedy is to be measured with speed and timely relief. Learned counsel at this juncture, however, submitted that if the coercive action, against the petitioner, is stayed, till the date he approaches the Civil Court, he will not press this petition.

2. . Petitioner will institute suit within six weeks from today, failing which respondents can initiate coercive measures.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search