Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1980 P Cr. L J 116

MUHAMMAD JAVED vs THE STATE

Citation1980 P Cr. L J 116
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 28-B of 1979
Date1979-10-01
Judge(s)M. S. H. Qureshi
ResultNOT

' The petitioner is accused in a case under section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act arising from F. I. R.

No, 372 dated 23rd July, 1979 of Police Station, Civil Lines, Rawalpindi. The allegation against him is that on checking, his attache-case which he had tendered as his baggage at the Islamabad Airport immediately before his intended departure for London, was found to contain 12 kilograms of charas valued at Rs, 1,00,000.00.

2. It is stated by learned counsel for the State that the offence also attracts the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979, and is punishable for two years. The matter however before me is the case under the Customs Act.

3. Learned counsel for the State informs this Court that the challah in the Customs case has since been submitted.

4. Bail is urged on the ground that the lodging of the F. I. R. Was delayed by 13-14 hours and that the petitioner's baggage had weighed 12 kilograms less when handed over to the P. I. A. Than it had weighed at the time of the search. According to the F. I. R., the recovery had taken place at 11-30 in the night of 22nd July, 1979, but the F. I. R. Had been lodged on the report of the Deputy Superintendent, Customs, at 1.15 in the day on 23rd July, 1979. Since the question of delay is a matter which the prosecution can explain during the trial, the same cannot be taken into consideration at this stage. The other ground raised regarding difference in the weight of the baggage is also a matter for evidence.

5. I am mindful of the fact that the offence being punishable with imprisonment for ten years under the Customs Act, attracts the prohibition A of section 497, Cr. P. C. In the matter of grant of bail. But considering the fact that the recovery has already been effected, that the challah has since been submitted, and that the petitioner has already remained in custody for more than two months and that his further detention is no longer required for the prosecution of the case, I am inclined to admit him to bail. I, therefore, direct that he be released on his furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs, 25,000.00 (rupees twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties in the like sum each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch