Fazal-e-Miran. Chauhan, J.--Khalid Hussain alias Kala, the petitioner, seeks post-arrest bail in case FIR No 128, dated 23.4 2007, offence under Section 9-B of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, registered at Police Station, Saddar Chichawatni, District Sahiwal for the allegation of recovery of Charas weighing 835 grams along with an amount of Rs, 250/- from the possession of the petitioner, hence this case.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that; that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case with mala fide intention and has no concern whatsoever with the alleged offence. The petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest and is no more required by the police.
There is no, evidence regarding sale or purchase of the Charas. The maximum punishment of the offence under Section 9(B) ibid, is even years, which does not fall within the prohibitory clause.
Reliance is placed on Shah Nawaz Thaheem vs. The State [2003 M LD 1236 (Karachi)]. There is no independent private witness of the alleged recovery, thus, the petitioner deserves the concession of bail.
3. Conversely, learned Additional Prosecutor General for the State opposed the bail petition contending that the petitioner is specifically named in the F.I.R.; he was caught red-handed at the spot therefore, he is not entitled to the concession of bail.
4. We have given the anxious consideration to the respective arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. It transpires that although the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., but there is no evidence on record against the petitioner regarding sale or purchase of Charas. No independent private witness was associated by the police during the recovery proceedings, which makes the case of the petitioner one of further inquiry. The petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest and his further detention in the judicial lock up would not serve any purpose. The maximum punishment of the offence is seven years, which does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. and keeping in view the detention of the petitioner during the trial, in these circumstances, is not warranted.
5. For what has been discussed above, this bail petition is accepted and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.