' ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.-Muhammad Hussain and Fateh Muhammad petitioners are accused along with some others under section 302/307/148/149, P. P. C. They were granted bail by the learned Sessions Judge but the same was cancelled by a learned Single Judge of the High Court vide the impugned judgment dated 20th of May, 1979, on the ground that after being released on bail in the aforementioned case they had murdered Ulfat, one of the prosecution witnesses in the said case and injured Ali Sher, another prosecution witness in the same case. Feeling aggrieved they have filed the present petition for special leave to appeal.
2. The main contention urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner was that Fateh Muhammad respondent No, 2 has not been mentioned as an accused in the F. I. R. In the case under section 302, P. P. C. That may be so but four witnesses including Ali Sher the injured P. W. Have implicated Fateh Muhammad as well as Muhammad Hussain petitioners in their statements recorded by the police during the investigation. The fact that one of the P. Ws. In the case under section 307, P. P. C.
Has been murdered while another has been injured is bound to result in the intimidation of the A remaining P. Ws. In that case.
' We are therefore of the view that the learned High Court Judge was justified in cancelling the petitioners' bail. The present petition is consequently dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.