' KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.--- The learned Advocate Supreme Court who had appeared in C.Ps. Nos.2747-L and 2748-L of 2002 has not entered appearance to prosecute these review petitions and we have been informed that he is not willing to do so despite having drawn and signed the said review petitions.
2. We have not been able to appreciate such a conduct of the learned Advocate Supreme Court.
Having drawn and signed a petition, the learned Advocate Supreme Court incurs an obligation to appear and assist this Court in the matter in question. We are surprised that the learned Advocate Supreme Court has not cared to discharge his said obligation. The position of the learned Advocate-on-Record is no better who says that he knows nothing about this matter and is therefor, not in a position to assist the Court.
3. We would have ordinarily dismissed these review petitions on this short ground alone but in the interest of justice, we have heard Mst. Fahmida Begum and her son Riaz-ur-Rehman petitioners at some length to ensure that the order sought to be reviewed had not operated unjustly on the petitioners. Having once again examined the entire matter, we find that no ground for review is made out and these petitions are, therefore dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.