Javed Iqbal. J.--Heard Mr. Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi, learned ASC on behalf of petitioner, Ch. Munir Sadiq, learned Deputy Prosecutor General for State, scanned the entire evidence with their eminent assistance and perused the order impugned carefully. It is to be noted that challan of the case has already been submitted, trial commenced and case is fixed for recording of prosecution evidence for 26.7.2007. The petitioner may move an application for bail before the learned trial Court. We are deliberately withholding our comments on merits of the case to avoid the possibility of causing prejudice against any party. By now it is well settled that it is not the practice of the Supreme Court to unduly intervene in bail matters, which should ordinarily be left to the discretion of the Courts inquiring into the guilt of the accused persons. The discretion has, of course, to be exercised on sound judicial principles. Leave to appeal is not granted by the Supreme Court where the grievance is that the High Court has, in the proper exercise of its jurisdiction, appreciated and assessed evidence or exercised discretion in a manner with which it is easily possible to disagree".
Abdul Haq v. State (1979 SCM R 254), Ghulam Nabi v. State (NLR 1978 Cri. 328), Sultan Khan v. Amir Khan (PLD 1977 SC 642), Haq Nawaz v. State (1969 P.Cr.LJ 358), Haq Nawaz v. State (1969 SCM R 174), Allah Diwaya v. State (PLD 1969 SC 98).
2. On the touchstone of the criterion as laid in the above referred to authorities the petition in hand has been examined and we are of the considered view that the order impugned does not call for any interference. The petition being devoid of merit is dismissed and leave refused.