1. The appellant has resorted to file Cr. Acquittal Appeal against the Respondents No, 2 to 5 in Crime No, 65/1988 under Section 458/337-A(1)/337-F(iv) PPC registered at Police Station Baldia Town, Karachi which was admitted for hearing on 25th August, 2003, came up for hearing on 27th April 2007 while Cr. Acquittal Appeal was dismissed on the premises that the appellant was not interested to pursue the same.
2. Mr. Mehmood A. Qureshi learned counsel for appellant has contended that it is settled principle of law that after a criminal appeal has been admitted for hearing it calls for a more intensive perusal and examination of record by the Appellate Court for deciding points of law and facts arising therein. Under no circumstances and at no stage the Cr. Appeal can be dismissed in default without reference to the merits of the appeal itself. Advertising to the facts of the present case appeal was admitted, as well as the respondents were directed to appeal before the Court had they had also furnished the surety for appearance in Court. However on account of non- appearance of the counsel appearing not on one date of hearing Cr. Acquittal Appeal was dismissed in default, and non-prosecution. In support of the above contentions reliance is placed on Ghulam Muhammad vs. The State PLD 1960 (W.P.) Lahore 11 and Muhammad Bakhsh vs. The State (1986 SCM R 59).
3. Learned State Counsel has conceded to the legal proposition advanced on behalf of the appellant.
4. I am convinced that after the admission of Cr. Appeal it could not be summarily dismissed without threshing the factual and legal aspects arising therein. None-appearance of the appellant and their counsel could not be a ground for dismissal unless all the questions raised on merits are not decided. In view of the legal position emerged out of the facts and circumstances of the case the impugned order is hereby set aside. Appeal is restored to its original position. Notice be issued to the respondents for appearance in Court on 4.9.2007.