Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Lahore) 17

FAYYAZ HUSSAIN vs STATE

CitationPLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Lahore) 17
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. A. No 294 of 2006 and Crl. Misc. No 1/of 2006
Date2006-06-28
Judge(s)Tariq Shamim, Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti
ResultPetition allowed.

ORDER

The petitioner Fiaz Hussain was convicted under Sections 302/34 PPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh, vide his judgment dated 2.6.2006. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was also convicted under Section 452 PPC and sentenced to two years' R.I. with a fine of Rs, 10,000/- and in default thereof to undergo SI for two months. He was also directed to pay compensation of Rs, 50,000/- to the legal heirs of the deceased under -Section 544-A, Cr.P.C. and in default thereof to undergo SI for six months. Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the suspension of his sentence.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that according to the medical evidence, the injury attributed to the petitioner was caused by sharp edged weapon, whereas, the petitioner was allegedly armed with blunt weapon i,e, iron rod at the time of occurrence; that there is a conflict between medical evidence and the ocular version; that the injury attributed to the petitioner is simple in nature and that the petitioner is in jail since 26.1.06.

3.On the other hand, learned counsel for the state has vehemently opposed the suspension of sentence and submits that specific role is attributed to the petitioner; that the petitioner had caused injury to the deceased on a vital part of his body; that recovery of iron rod was effected from the petitioner and that during investigation, the petitioner was found guilty.

4.Arguments heard. Record perused.

5. The petitioner was allegedly armed with an iron rod at the time of occurrence but injury attributed to him i,e, Injury No, 2 is sharp edged weapon which clearly shows Inaba fide on the part of the prosecution. There is material conflict between medical evidence and ocular account of occurrence: Moreover, learned trial Court has itself held that injury attributed to the petitioner was not fatal. The appeal relates to year 2006 and there is no likelihood of hearing of the main appeal in the near future.

6. For the foregoing reasons, we allow this petition and sentence .awarded to Fayyaz Hussain petitioner is hereby suspended subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 100,000/- (rupees one lac only) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judl.) of this Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch