Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2008 CLC 1366

Dr. Syed HASSAN ALI through Attorney vs Mst. TAZEEN ZAHRA and another

Citation2008 CLC 1366
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Suit No,1165 of 2006
Date2008-05-15
Judge(s)Nadeem Azhar Siddiqui
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' NADEEM AZHAR SIDDIQI, J.--- Vide order, dated 11-12-2006 and objection was raised with regard to maintainability of the suit.

2. ' Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that plaintiff is claiming the right in the property on the basis of some Gift executed by defendant No,2 and suit has been rightly filed on the original side of this Court.

3. ' Learned counsel further submits that whether the claim of the plaintiff is proper or not cannot be adjudicated at this stage and plaint cannot be rejected.

4. ' Mr. S. Nasir Abbas learned counsel for the defendant No,2 submits that in the suit plaintiff has claimed such relief, which cannot be granted by this Court and relief can only be claimed through Family Court. He further submits that plaintiff has also filed a suit for damages at London and is not entitled to claim any damages in this suit.

5. 'I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. The main prayer of the plaintiff is in respect of plots situated at Karachi. Since plaintiff is claiming right in the property, thus suit cannot be summarily dismissed at this stage. The question whether the plaintiff is rightly claiming or wrongly claiming the right in the property can also not be adjudicated without providing opportunity to the parties to lead evidence in support of their case.

6. ' In view of the above, the objection raised vide order dated 11-12-2006 is recalled.

7. ' Serial No,5. By this application under Order VII, rule 11, C.P.C. By the plaintiff has prayed for rejection of the plaint.

8. ' After hearing of the parties to some extent, the learned counsel for the defendant submits that for the time being he does not want to press this application and will file a fresh application after filing of written statement. In view of the above this application stands dismissed as not pressed with the permission to file a fresh application.

9. ' Serial No,6 By this application, the plaintiff has prayed that the defendant may be directed to file written statement as required under the law.

10. ' Mr. S. Nasir Abbas, Advocate for the defendant No,2 request for 15 days time for filing the written statement. In view of the above, this application is disposed of with the direction to the defendants to file their respective written statement within 15 days.

11. ' Serial No,3 Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has been enrolled as an advocate of the High Court and does not want to press this application and the same stands dismissed as not pressed.

12. ' Serial No,2 For the time being and subject to all just exception, this application is allowed.

13. ' Serial No,7 Hearing of this application is to be taken up after filing of the counter affidavit and written statement by the defendants.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch