Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Lahore) 70

BASHIR AHMED and another vs STATE

CitationPLJ 2008 Cr.C. (Lahore) 70
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. 6931-B of 2007
Date2007-10-17
Judge(s)M. Bilal Khan
ResultBail allowed.

ORDER

1. Bashir Ahmad son of Faqir Muhammad and Abr Bashir son of Bashir Ahmad, the petitioners, by filing this petition, reek post-arrest bail in case FIR No, 525/2007 dated 10.8.2007, registe red with Police Station Saddar Samundari, District. Faisalabad, for offences under Section 354-A, 337- L(2)/34 PPC.

2. The allegations against the petitioners, in the FIR registered at the instance of Mst. Niamat Bibi, wife of Talib, the complainant, was that when Mst. Saha Bibi, a virgin daughter of the complainant was going back home shepherding her goats and had reached near the house of the petitioners, the latter while armed with sotas caught hold of her and tried to forcibly, take her away; when her mother had tried to rescue her, the accused inflicted sota blows to both of them causing them injuries and as a result of beatings their wearing apparel were torn off.

2. 3.The petiotner's pre-arrest bail had been turned down by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Samundari on 23.8.2007 whereafter his plea for post-arrest bail also did not find favour with the said learned Judge who dismissed his application vide order dated 15.9.2007. Hence this petition.

3. 4.I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record.

4. 5: According to the statement of Munawwar Hussain S.I, which has been recorded separately, the Board constituted under Art. 18(6) of the Police Order, 2002 had declined to transfer the investigation of case (FIR No, 525/07) and that during the course of investigation he found that although a clash/scuffle did take place between the parties, in which stick blows were caused, yet no clothes were torn off, as alleged in the FIR, therefore, Section 354-A, PPC was not attracted. The said Section had been invoked by the police after a learned Addl. Sessions Judge, while disposing of the pre-arrest bail application of the petitioners, had remarked that prima facie, said section appears to have been applicable. Needles to add that initially the case had been registered under Section 337-L(2) & 354/34 PPC. It is also not denied that Talib Hussain, husband of the complainant Mst. Niamat Bibi had divorced the latter on 3.7.2007 and the said person is presently living with the petitioners. In this situation the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated, as they were providing refuge to Talib Hussain, cannot be lightly brushed aside. This assertion coupled with the opinion of the Ivestigating Officer that Section 354-A PPC was not attracted, render the case of the petitioners one of further inquiry within the meanings of sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C.

5. 5.Resultantly this petition is allowed and the petitioners are admitted to post-arrest bail provided they furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 50,000/- each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch