' FAQIR MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR, J.--- The respondents instituted a suit against the petitioners claiming therein that their predecessor-in-interest late Mst. Sakina Bibi was owner of the suit-land measuring 1 Kanal and 6 Sarsais. Consequent upon her death the same was inherited by them along with other legal heirs. It was further averred that the registered sale-deed dated 8-6-1999 purportedly executed by the petitioner No,2 in favour of his wife the petitioner No,1 on the strength of a general power of attorney dated 28-5-1999 was invalid, fictitious and ineffective qua their rights. The suit was dismissed by the Civil V Judge, Faisalabad vide judgment, dated 14-7-2005.
However, their appeal was allowed by the Additional District Judge, Faisalabad vide judgment, dated 28-6-2006 and the suit was decreed. The Civil Revision No,1700 of 2006 of the petitioners was dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Lahore vide impugned judgment dated 5-9-2006.
2. The learned counsel submitted that the execution of power of attorney of late Mst. Sakina Bibi in favour of her son, the petitioner No,2 and the sale-deed dated 8-6-1999 were not specifically denied. Therefore, the same stood proved.
3. We have heard the learned counsel at length and have also perused the available record. We find that the High Court as well as the First Appellate Court have recorded concurrent findings of fact in coming to the conclusion that the due execution of the general power of attorney as well as the registered sale-deed by petitioner No,2 in favour of his wife, the petitioner No,1, were not proved in accordance with law. No misreading or non-reading of evidence was pointed out. Moreover, there was nothing on record to show that the petitioner No,2 being general attorney had obtained any permission from the principal, late Mst. Sakina Bibi for the purpose of sale of the suit-land in favour of his wife, the petitioner No,
1. In our view, the impugned judgment is plainly correct to which no exception can be taken.
4. For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed and leave to appeal is refused accordingly.