Pakistan Case Law← Search
2008 P Cr. L J 211

ABDUL QADIR TAWAKKAL vs CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU,

Citation2008 P Cr. L J 211
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Constitutional Petition No,2402 of 2006
Date2007-05-22
Judge(s)Rehmat Hussain Jaffery, Muhammad Afzal Soomro
ResultBail granted

ORDER

1. Granted.

2. The petitioner is involved in Crime No,15/96 which was registered at police station F.I.A.-C.B.C.

Karachi on 27-8-1996. After investigation, the case was challaned in Special Court created under Ordinance IX of 1984. Pending adjudication of the case, the petitioner moved bail application before this Court, which was granted vide order. Dated 22-12-1999. On the application of Chairman NAB, the case was transferred to Accountability Court, Karachi which was received by the said Court on 2-8-2003. Since then, the case is pending. Except framing of charge, no witness has been examined by the prosecution before the Accountability Court.

' In the above circumstances, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner was already granted bail by this Court in the sum of Rs,597.3789 Million as the bail amount was fixed keeping in view the statutory provisions of section 5(7) of Ordinance IX of 1984, but he could not furnish the required surety as he could not arrange the surety of amount involved in the case.

He has further stated that the petitioner may be allowed to remain on same bail but requested that surety amount may be reduced because after transfer of the case, the statutory provisions of the said Ordinance would not be applicable. The learned A.D.P.-G. Has stated that as the bail has been granted by this court and no change in circumstances have taken place therefore he has no objection in allowing the petitioner to remain on same bail but the surety amount may be reduced to the amount which is involved in the Reference.

We have examined the order granting bail to the petitioner. The reasons assigned for granting bail are sufficient to grant bail at this stage also. Furthermore the case has not proceeded from 1996 to this date. Even the Accountability Court has not completed the trial within a period of four years after receipt of the case and no witness has been examined by the court as per statement of learned Advocate for the petitioner and confirmed by A.D.P.-G. Under the law Accountability Court is required to complete the case within a period of 30 days as provided under section 16(a) of NAB Ordinance; The proceedings of the case have been delayed for a period of more than 10 years which amounts to abuse of process of law.

' In these circumstances, we grant bail to the petitioner in the sum of Rs,10,00,000 (Rupees ten Lacs only) on furnishing solvent surety and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court.

' The petition is allowed.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search