' IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, J.- The petitioners vide judgment dated 26-2-2005 having been found guilty under section 392, P.P.C. Were sentenced to three years R.I. Each with fine, of Rs. 5*000 each by the learned Magistrate 1st Class, Layyah while extending them benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.
Then the appeal filed by the petitioners against the aforesaid conviction and sentence was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karor, District Layyah vide judgment dated 5- 3-2005 and this revision petition was. Filed before this Court. Through the instant application the petitioners seek suspension of the sentence.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The main revision petition has been admitted for regular bearing on the ground that according * to P.W.3 the assailants were with muffled faces, but no identification parade was conducted. The petitioners have already undergone sufficient period in jail, but there is ho possibility of hearing of main revision petition in the near future. Hence, the operation of impugned judgment of conviction is suspended and the petitioners shall be released on bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to. The satisfaction of learned trial Court.'
Order, accordingly. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.