' In this Constitutional petition the petitioner has sought the following relief:
(a) To direct the respondent No,5 to implement the orders passed by its appellate authority respondent No, 2% Ann. "F" in appeal under Rule 96-A of the Motor Vehicle Rules, 1969 and so also passed by the Honourable Ombudsman upholding the orders of respondent No, 2 being lawful authority, as the board of respondent No,3'or respondent No,5 after passing of the orders did not challenge the same in accordance with law, and allow the petitioner the route permits for the required necessity of the route.
(b) Any other relief this Honourable Court may deem necessary.
(c) Cost of petition.
2. From the perusal of the memo. Of petition and the prayer reproduced hereinabove, it is absolutely, clear that the petitioner has approached this Court for implementation/execution of the order of the Secretary to Government of. Sindh, Labour and Transport Department/Chairman, Provincial Transport Authority Sindh. Mr. Sarwar, learned Addl. A.G. Has filed a statement along with Annexures `A-1' and `A-2' according to which, the order of the Chairman, Provincial Transport Authority has been implemented and nothing further remains to be done on the part of the concerned authorities.
3. Even otherwise, from the perusal of the prayer clause, it transpires that the petitioner has approached, this Court for implementation/execution of the order of the Chairman. Provincial Transport Authority Sindh, and the Ombudsman. This Court does not act as an executing Court of any authority/Court or Tribunal except the Supreme Court in view of the provisions of Article 187 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
4. Although the constitutional petition is not maintainable yet after issuance of notices to the concerned authorities, it has been brought on record that the order in B question has been implemented and nothing remains to be done further. Accordingly, this constitutional petition stands dismissed in limine .