Brief facts giving rise to the instant revision petition are that the petitioner had applied for post- arrest bail in a case relating to FIR No. 46/05 dated 29.1.2005 under Sections 337-F(v), 337-F(i), 34, P.P.C. Mice Station Jampur District Rajanpur. The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, vide his order dated 9.7.2005 granted the bail subject to payment of Rs. 19,000/- to the complainant by way of compensation as promised by the petitioner during a Punchayat.
2. The aforesaid order to the extent of imposition of the said condition is now under challenge through the instant revision petition.
3. Arguments heard. Record perused.
4. I have noticed that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge in his order dated 9.7.2005 lime-lighted the factors justifying the grant of post-arrest bail to the petitioner. He has clearly observed in the said order that, the present petitioner rightly deserves for concession of bail". I have also noticed that there is nothing in black & white on the file of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge as well as the police file that the petitioner had, ever promised to pay a sum of Rs. 19,000/- by way of compensation to the complainant.
5. All the above factors taken together persuade me to hold that imposition of condition of Rs.
19,000/- before enlarging the petitioner on bail is not justified and the same is hereby set-aside, by allowing this revision petition. Resultantly, petitioner shall be immediately released on bail as ordered 'by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge on 9.7.2005, "subject to furnishing surety bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of this Court (learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jampur)".
6. I have been told that the petitioner is behind the bars since 7.2.2005. It is a pity that he remaind behind the bars for such a long time, without there being any fault/omission on his party. Hence, the office shall convey the instant order to the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Jampur, immediately.