' It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that allegation against the petitioner is that he along with his co- accused caught hold the deceased and gave him fist blow while co-accused Shahid alias Shedi fired a shot with pistol which hit the deceased on his neck; that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner; that he was placed in Column No.2 of the challan; that there is only one injury on the deceased persons; that case of the petitioner is of further inquiry.
2. Learned State counsel submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. But he has been found innocent by the police and he has been- placed in Column No.2 of the challan.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. I have gone through F.I.R., report* under section 173, Cr.P.C., and submission of the parties and impugned order. According to the F.I.R. Petitioner was present at the spot. He caught hold of the deceased and later on Imran and Umar also caught hold the deceased and Shahid alias Shedi co-accused caused single injury on the person of deceased.
Seven accused are named in the F.I.R. Petitioner along with two other accused namely Muhammad Shahid and Shahid alias Shedi have been placed in Column No.2 of the challan. In fact no injury is attributed to the petitioner. Case of* the petitioner is of further inquiry. This petition is accepted and the petitioner shall be released on bail if he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.