' DOST MUHAMMAD KHAN, J.--- Both the trial Court (Civil Judge, Chitral) and Appellate Court (District Judge, Chitral) have dismissed the suit of the petitioners vide judgments dated 25-4-2002 and 29-3-2003 respectively which they have questioned through the present petition.
' Arguments heard and available record perused.
2. The petitioners claim is that they are owners of the suit-land fully described in the plaint which they have inherited from their forefathers and that the sale-deed dated 4-5-1973 from the plaintiffs in favour of defendants is wrong and ineffective upon their rights.
3. The parties were put to trial in view of the issues framed wherein, both the parties adduced evidence for and against.
4. The crucial point in the case is the sale-deed Exh.D.W.1/2. One of the attesting witnesses, namely, Punjarash Khan resiled and denied his signature on the deed and the transaction itself, however, both the learned Courts below have held him telling lie and falsely denying his signature over the sale-deed and the transaction because he has admitted that the hand of daughter of respondent-defendant No,1 was demanded by him for his son which was refused.
5. In this case besides the sale-deed sufficient old enough, under the same, the defendants had entered into possession of the suit-land and are continuously in possession of the same without any break. The possession of the respondents/defendants has been established because the reports of the two local commissions have confirmed this fact.
6. Under the law possession by itself speaks in favour of ownership and if it is under an unregistered deed, it serves as a strong valid defence as held by the Honourable Supreme Court time and again.
7. Apart the above facts, the two learned Courts below have recorded concurrent findings on question of facts and of law which ordinarily are not susceptible to be interfered with in limited revisional jurisdiction. Reliance in this regard is placed on Kanwal Nain's case PLD 1983 SC 53.
' For what has been discussed above, this petition fails which is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.