Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2007 Cr.C. (Lahore) 74

RASHID IQBAL vs STATE

CitationPLJ 2007 Cr.C. (Lahore) 74
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No. 2366-B of 2006
Date2006-08-24
Judge(s)Muhammad Jehangir Arshad
ResultBail granted.

ORDER

Rashid Iqbal petitioner seeks confirmation of his pre-arrest bail granted by this Court on 23.7.2006 in case FIR No. 137 dated 29.4.2006 under Section 10(3) of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood)

Ordinance VII of 1979 Police Station Kasowal, District Sahiwal. Mst. Saima Bibi the alleged abductee and victim appeared before this Court and made a categorical statement that she had contracted marriage with Rashid Iqbal petitioner and now is living with him as his legally wedded wife and that she was neither abducted by the petitioner nor was subjected to zina bil jabr within the meanings of Section 10(3) of the said Ordinance. She further stated that case was got registered by her under pressure of her father.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the complainant as well as state have opposed this application by contending that in fact Mst Saima is now under pressure of the petitioner, therefore, she is retracting from her earlier stance, otherwise, she had got the case registered with her free consent attributing commission of zina-bil-jabr by the petitioner therefore, her statement at this stage cannot be considered as a valid piece of evidence.

3. Arguments considered. Record perused.

4. In view of statement of Mst. Saima Bibi the alleged victim/abductee who is sui-juris categorically denying the allegation of her abduction or commission of zina bil jabr by the petitioner and admitting her marriage with Rashid Iqbal petitioner, the legal position though stands changed in view of provisions of Section 156-B Cr.P.C. prohibiting arrest of any accused in an offence under Hudood Ordinance without the permission of the concerned Magistrate, (not in case of zina-bil- jabr) even no formal order of bail is required by this Court, yet in view of the contest by the father of Mst. Saima as well as learned counsel for the state, I deem it appropriate to allow this application which is accordingly accepted and ad-interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to the petitioner by this Court on 24.7.2006 is hereby confirmed subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum o Rs.

5,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learner trial Court, within ten days.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch