ORDER TASSADDUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.--Petitioner/pre-emptor has been non-suited by the learned Lahore High Court and Appellate Court's judgment was reversed on the ground that he failed to prove "Talab-i- Muwathibat" and "Talab-i-Ishad".
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned High Court has misread and non- read the material evidence with regard to the performance of "talabs" and that the judgment is not sustainable.
3. While disbelieving the evidence produced by the petitioner with regard to the performance of "Talabs" the High Court concurred with the learned Trbunal court court on issue No. 13 and observed as under While deciding issue No. 13 the learned Trial Court observed that the plaintiff has produced his evidence to prove that he has completed the requirements of Talabs according to law enforced The learned Trial Court while discussing the evidence of PW-3 Qalb-e- Hussain, PW-4 Nadar Hussain and Muhammad Sharif, PW-5 observed that the plaintiff completed the requirement of Talab-i-Muwathibat on 18.7.1995 but according to the contents of the plaint the disputed sale was completed on 4 4 1995 and the first Talab was completed on 18.7.1995 while the plaintiff was under obligation to complete first Talab within 15 days of the completion of sale."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not referred to any piece of evidence which cloud persuade us to interfere with the afore-referred finding of the High Court as also of the Trial Court.
That being' so, we do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed and .