' JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J.--- This revision petition impugns the concurrent findings of the learned trial Court, dated 19-6-1994 and of the learned lower Appellate Court dated 2-12-1997 whereby a suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs was decreed.
2. The facts of the case have been set out in the impugned judgments and need not therefore, be reproduced.
3. Ahmed Hussain, admittedly, was the son of Pir Bukhsh and was a consanguine brother of Muhammad Anwar who died in 1939 during the lifetime of Pir Bukhsh and Muhammad Younus who died in 1973. The question, which has to be decided, is whether Ahmed Hussain as consanguine brother would inherit the estate of Muhammad Younus to the exclusion of the petitioners who are sons of Muhammad Yousuf who was the full brother of Muhammad Younas who died in 1947.
Learned counsel for the respondents has referred to the treatise on Mahomedan Law by Mulla wherein it has been clearly set out that a consanguine brother will exclude from inheritance the sons of a full brother because' the consanguine brother is a higher residuary.
4. The Courts below have, therefore, correctly appreciated and applied the law of inheritance. The impugned judgments and decrees are therefore, unexceptionable. As a consequence this petition is dismissed.