1. ' JAVED IQBAL, J.--- Heard Sayyed Mazhar All Akbar Naqvi, learned Advocate Supreme Court on behalf of petitioner (in Criminal Petition No, 109-L of 2005) and Mr. Muhammad Akram Sheikh, learned Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Mr. Nasiruddin Khan Nayyar, learned Advocate Supreme Court for petitioner (in Criminal Petition No,110-L of 2005), as well as Mr. Zahid Hussain Bukhari, learned Advocate Supreme Court for complainant, scanned the entire record with their eminent assistance and perused the judgment impugned with care and caution. We are inclined to grant leave in the above captioned petitions, inter alia, on the following points:--
(i) Whether the evidence which had come on record has been appreciated in its true perspective in accordance, with the settled norms of justice and the well-entrenched principles enunciated by Supreme Court qua the safe administration of justice?
(ii) Whether the capital punishment could have been awarded on the basis of interested and partisan evidence furnished by the interested witnesses in absence of any corroboration and in view of admitted background of enmity?
(iii) Whether the factum of abscission can be considered as corroboratory piece of evidence in case of capital punishment?
(iv) Whether the judgment impugned is in consonance with the law laid down by this Court in case Rasool Muhammad v. Asal Muhammad 1995 SCM R 1373 qua factum of abscission.
2. ' The appeals may be fixed at some early date.