MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.---Vide judgment dated 3-3-2005, this Court allowed Writ Petition No,8785 of 2002 filed by the petitioner and directed the respondents to consider him for employment being the son of a deceased employee, Present Crl. Org. Has been filed complaining that the said judgment is not being complied with. The respondent has filed a written reply and has taken the plea that upon a perusal of the birth certificate produced by the petitioner in juxtaposition to the death of his father, it has become doubtful as to whether he is the son of the deceased employee or not.
2. I have examined the records of the writ petition and I find that it was categorically stated repeatedly in the writ petition that the petitioner is the son of Allah Yar, a deceased employee of the respondent-Corporation. Written statement was filed which was signed by the General Manager as also the learned counsel for respondent. It was nowhere denied. Father was admitted without any demur that the petitioner is the son of the said deceased employee. This being so, even if there is some discrepancy in the said documents, the respondent or the said Corporation cannot deny the said fact duly admitted in the course of pleadings in the said writ petition decided inter parties.
Needless to state that no appeal was filed against the said of judgment this Court. It is but apparent that there has been a noncompliance of the judgment of this Court but hi the circumstances of the case where the respondent-Officer has pleaded said confusion of the discrepancy of the date of birth of the petitioner vis-a-vis the date of his father's death, I am not inclined to take any punitive action. The Crl. Org., however, is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to comply with the said judgment and to issue the requisite orders within two months from today under intimation to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.