ORDER The learned Counsel argued that neither the agreement for sale dated 27,05.1976 was proved nor the same was enforceable at law being violative of the provisions of Section 19 of the Colonization of Government 102 S.C. Key Law Reports Vo.1. XXVI Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 as well as under the provisions of the Contract Act and the Specific Relief Act, 2000. It was further submitted that the impugned judgment suffered from misreading and non-reading of evidence on record and that even the document Ex. D-16 was not adverted to by the High Court. Reliance was placed on the case of Sardar Muhammad v. Muhammad Akram and others (2000 YLR 1824).
2. Leave to appeal is granted to consider the above and the other submissions.