Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2007 YLR 2951

MUHAMMAD ALI vs THE STATE

Citation2007 YLR 2951
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal. Miscellaneous No,4693-B of 2004
Date2004-07-19
Judge(s)M. Bilal Khan
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

' M. BILAL KHAN, J.---Muhammad Ali son of Allah Mehar seeks his post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,17 dated 18-2-2004 registered at Police Station Mitha Tiwana, District Khushab, for offences under sections 324/34, P.P.C.

2. The prosecution case as unfolded by the complainant Muhammad Shahid son of Muhammad Saleem was that he was a resident of Chak No,47 M.B. And was visiting his relations at Chak No,4 TDA. To attend a wedding party; around 9 a.m. When he was present at his relative Abdullah's place he heard a lalkara and immediately thereafter Muhammad Ali petitioner along with his co- accused Iftikhar son of Hassan Muhammad, Nadeem son of Mustafa all residents of the said Chak No,4 TDA while armed with firearms reached there; as soon as he came out of the door , on hearing the noise Muhammad Ali petitioner fired with his gun which hit him on the front side below the neck; he fell down whereafter Nadeem co-accused made a straight fire at him, however, the said fire hit Abdul Sattar at his Shalwar, on his hue and cry witnesses arrived there who witnessed the occurrence and beseeched the accused persons to stop firing. According to the complainant the motive was that in the morning at about 7-30 a.m. The complainant had a quarrel with the accused persons in which Muhammad Anwar son of. Allah Mehr had been injured. According to him it was on this grudge that the murderous assault had been launched. Accordingly the instant case was recorded.

3. The petitioner was arrested immediately after the occurrence and is in custody ever since. His petition for post arrest bail did not find favour with the learned Additional Session Judge, Khushab who turned down the same vide order dated 21-6-2004. Hence the instant petition.

4. I have heard Mr. M.A. Zafar, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sheikh Khursheed Iqbal, the learned counsel for the State and have also carefully examined the record brought by Sheikh Asmatullah A.S.-I.

5. It has been observed that the gunshot injury suffered by the injured was a wound of entrance 1/2 c.m.x1/2 c.m. In size on right lower side of neck. The said injury had been declared to be falling under Section 337-F(i), .P.P. C . Entailing punishment of one year. It is also transpired from the perusal of the record that on the petitioner's application a Medical Board was assembled at District Headquarters Hospital Khushab, which had examined Muhammad Shahid injured and opined that the possibility of fabrication could not be ruled out. The perusal of the record also reveals that the police had found the petitioner to be innocent and recommendation for his discharge was in the pipeline. The District Police Officer had also agreed with the opinion of innocence recorded by the D.S.P. It has also been noticed that F.I.R. No,18 had been recorded at the instance of the accused party wherein Muhammad Anwar son of Allah Mehr a real brother of the petitioner had suffered as many as 13 injuries by sharp and blunt edged weapons. The plea of the petitioner that in fact he and his A companions had been attacked but the police instead of registering their case choose to register F.I.R. No,17 against them cannot be lightly brushed aside. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case especially keeping in view the damage attributed to the petitioner altough he was armed with a lethal firearm, the applicability of section 324 P.P.C. As also his common intention in my opinion, call for further inquiry.

6. Resultantly this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bond in the sum of Rs,50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch