1. GHULAM RASOOL SHAIKH (CHAIRMAN).-Before we proceed to write this order it may be pointed out that the main record of the Chairman of the Tribunal was misplaced by the staff after the order was duly written on 11-6-1979. In spite of the best efforts the record is not traceable. Consequently it has become necessary to reconstitute to record. In this Tribunal 4 files are maintained. One file is for the Chairman, 2 files are for the Members and one file is for the Registrar but the final order is contained in the file of the Chairman. So file of Member-I is now being treated as the main file and- following fresh order is being re-written from the dictation taken by the steno in his note book as well as after considering the entire record.
2. This appeal has been filed under section 4 of the Sind Service Tribunals Act, 1973 claiming seniority against the respondent No. 3.
3. The appellant was a P. C. S. Officer and he was shown as S. No. 6 in the seniority list. He felt aggrieved of the position which was assigned to him. His representations to the Government proved futile so he filed the present appeal.
4. The appellant was absent while we had heard the respondents Nos. 3 and 4 who were present.
5. At the outset it may be pointed out that section 3 of the Sind Civil Servants Act, Sind Act No. XIV of 1973 dated 5th December 1973 lays down that the terms and conditions of service of a civil servant shall be as provided in this Act and the rules. So section 8 of the Act is decisive with regard to the maintainability of the appeal relating to seniority.' This section reads as under : "8.-(1) For proper administration of a service, cadre or grade, the appointing authority shall cause a seniority list of the members for the time being of such service, cadre or grade to be prepared, but nothing herein contained shall be construed' to confer any vested right to a particular seniority in such service, cadre or grade, as the case may be.
(2) Subject to the provisions of subsection (1), the seniority of a civil servant shall be reckoned in relation to other civil servants belonging to the same service or grade, whether serving in the same department or office or not, as may be prescribed.
(3) Seniority on initial appointment to a service, grade or post shall be determined as may be prescribed.
(4) Seniority in the grade to which a civil servant is promoted shall take effect from the date of regular appointment to a post in that grade: Provided that civil servants who are selected for promotion to a higher grade in one batch shall, on their promotion to the higher grade, retain their inter se seniority as in the lower grade.
6. Although according to the aforesaid section it is incumbent upon the administration to prepare the seniority list but at the same time this section lays down that this does not confer any vested right to a particular seniority in such a service, cadre or grade as the case may be. Thus the vested right with regard to seniority has not been conferred or in other words any such right has been taken away. So the seniority is not on of the terms and conditions of service. Consequently a civil servant cannot invoke the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to vindicate or establish anything which is not a right.
7. It therefore, follows that by virtue of the aforesaid section the jurisdiction of this Tribunal is barred and no appeal lies under section 4 of the Sind Service Tribunals Act, 1973. In this connection reference may also be made to rule 23 of the Sind Service Tribunal (Procedure Rules, 1974 which empowers the Full Bench of the Tribunal or some o the Members of the Tribunal to decide certain appeals but it is pertinent to note that in this rule the word "seniority" nowhere appears. Thus, it is plain enough that the Legislature never intended that the question of seniority be agitated before this Tribunal.
8. In result the appeal is dismissed.