' M. BILAL KHAN, J.-Mst. Shumaila daughter of Muhammad Yousaf, petitioner by filing Criminal Miscellaneous N0.3947-B of 2005 and Mst. Kaneez wife of Gulzar and Mst. Parveen wife of Sher by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No,4334-B of 2005 seek their post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No, 147 dated 2-5-2005, registered at Police Station Urban Area, Sargodha for offences under section 13/14 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance No,Vll of 1979 at the instance of Abdul Latif Khan, S.L of the said Police Station.
2. Briefly the case of the prosecution as it unfolded in the F.I.R, was that the complainant, on receipt of the information laid before him by one Sufi Irshad Ahmad that Mst. Sakina Bibi was running a brothel house and she had invited six females and six males for immoral purpose, had raided her house and apprehended thirteen persons, six females and seven males, named in the F.I.R, inclusive of the petitioners, who were standing nearby the front door of her house.
3. The petitioners' plea for post-arrest bail did not find favour with the leamed Additional Sessions Judge, Sargodha, who turned down the same vide order dated 11-5-2005. Hence, this petition.
4. I have heard the Teamed counsel for both the sides and have also gone through the record brought by Muhammad Akram, A.S.-I., Police Station Urban Area, Sargodha.
5. Perusal of the F.I.R, itself reveals that the only allegation against the petitioners was that they .Were standing outside the house of Mst. Sakina Bibi and nothing beyond that. The record also reveals that at present there is no worthwhile material available to connect them with the commission of the alleged offences. In view of the prima facie dubious allegations in the F.I.R., case of the petitioners becomes one of further inquiry within the meaning of sub-section (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
6. Resultantly, these petitions are allowed and the petitioners are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.