' KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J.---It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that he was not named in the F.I.R. That he was named on 16-3-2006 through the statement of Nazir Ahmad Arms Dealer and one Abdul Majid and that case of petitioner is of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C.
2. Learned State counsel on the instructions of S.-I. Present in Court submits that there is no evidence on record. S.-I. Submits that Arms Dealer had stated that petitioner along with his co- accused had purchased 25 rounds from him. Both admit that there is no other evidence on record against the petitioner.
3. Heard. There is no evidence on record except the statement of Nazir Ahmad Arms Dealer and one Abdul Majid. In this view of the matter, I am of the considered is opinion that case of petitioner of further inquiry falling under subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. This petition is accepted and petitioner is allowed bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,100,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (J) of this Court.