1. ' AMIR RANI MUSLIM, J.--- The only question which has been raised in these proceedings is whether the Appellate Court can modify the order of the Rent controller for fixation of rent from the date of passing of the order or from the date of filing of the rent case. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that this is the discretion of the Court. The learned counsel has not shown any law on the point that the discretion exercised by the Appellate Court was erroneous. He, however, has relied upon the previous order of the Rent Controller against which appeal was not preferred by either party and in the said proceedings the Rent Controller has fixed the payment of rent from the date of filing of the rent case. In the present proceedings admittedly the party has preferred appeal against the order of the Rent Controller, in which the Rent Controller has fixed the payment of enhanced rent from the date of filing of the rent proceedings. The Appellate Court while agreeing with the quantum of rent of the Rent Controller has owever, modified the order to the extent that the rent at the new rate be paid by the tenant from the date of passing of order of the Rent Controller and not from the date of filing of the ejectment application.
2. I do not find any legal infirmity in the order passed by the Appellate Court. Accordingly this petition is dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.