JAWWAD S. KHAWAJA, J. --- This revision petition impugns the concurrent findings of the learned Trial Court. Dated 18.9.1997 and of the 'learned lower Appellate Court dated 18.6.2001 whereby a suit filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs was dismissed.
2. The facts of the case have been set out in the impugned judgments and need not, therefore, by reproduced in extenso. After considering the evidence on record the learned Courts below have rightly concluded that the respondents/defendants had acquired title through registered sale- deeds, which were executed approximately thirty years prior to the filing of the declaratory suit by the petitioners. The evidence is also clear that the respondents/defendanis are in possession of the suit property since the date they acquired title therein. A local commission was appointed who confirmed this fact. Likewise, Allah Wassaya, petitioner No. 1, who appeared as PW 1, also acknowledged this fact. In these circumstances, I find the impugned decrees to be unexceptionable. Furthermore, learned counsel for the petitioners was unable to advert to any such jurisdictional error or other legal infirmity in the impugned judgments which would justify interference therein while exercising revisional jurisdiction. In' these circumstances, I find no merit in this petition which is therefore, dismissed. . revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.