1. MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.--- The petitioner has been proceeded ex parte and this order has been challenged by the petitioner and his case is that he has wrongly, noted the date; this is controverted by the counsel for the respondent. Obviously, this is a question of fact, which cannot be resolved without enabling the parties to produce evidence. Let the petitioner move a proper application before the learned Judge Family Court, who shall frame an issue and, after recording the evidence decide, whether he has noted the date wrongly and was erroneously proceeded ex parte. Disposed of.