Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2007 YLR 2918

ABDUL HAQUE vs THE STATE

Citation2007 YLR 2918
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No.9551/B of 2006
Date2007-02-08
Judge(s)Khawaja Muhammad Sharif
ResultBail granted

ORDER

' KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD. SHARIF, J.- Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of this bail petition contends that the petitioner has falsely been involved in this case; that there is a delay of five months in lodging-the F.I.R.; that he remained on physical remand for full fourteen days but nothing was recovered; that the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. That the case of the petitioner is one of further inquiry and that the petitioner is entitled to the concession of bail.

2. On the other hand, Mr. Naseeruddin Khan Nayyar, the learned Additional'Prosecutor-General assisted by complainant's learned counsel submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.; that the challan was submitted on 4-11-2006 and the case is fixed for evidence for today while on the last date of' hearing it was adjourned due to adjournment sought by petitioner party and that the petitioner is not entitled to the discretionary relief of bail from this Court.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, have given consideration to the submissions made at the bar and have also gone through the record.

4. Admittedly, all the accused except the petitioner, have already been allowed bail by the learned Additional Session Judge. There is a delay of five months in lodging the F.I.R., petitioner was arrested on 30-7-2006, he remained on physical remand for full fourteen days but nothing was recovered from him, even till today the alleged abductee has not been recovered so far, the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C., In the afore-referred circumstances, this Court is of the, prima- facie, view that the petitioner has made out a case falling under subsection (2) to section 497, Cr.P.C. And is entitled to the concession of bail. In such- like cases grant of. Bail is a rule while refusal is an exception; Reliance is placed on Tariq Bashir and 6 others v. The State PLD 1996 SC* 34. Resultantly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is admitted to- bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch