' KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.--- It is the claim of the petitioner that he had returned the Dowry etc. To the respondent and an agreement (Exh.D/1) was pressed into service to support the said claim. It was rightly held by the learned High Court that Mst. Musarrat Bibi respondent was not a party to the said agreement; that according to the petitioner the said agreement had been allegedly signed by the two brothers of the first respondent acting on her behalf which signatures had been denied by the said brothers and that the petitioner could not show any authority given by Mst. Musarrat Bibi to her brothers to enter into A the said agreement with the petitioner.
2. In this view of the matter, the findings of the learned High Court affirming the conclusions reached by the learned Additional District Judge, Ferozewala were not open to any exception.
3. This petition is, therefore, dismissed.. Leave refused.