ORDER MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR ARSHAD, J. -- Thepetitioner who is one of the accused in case FIR No. 10, dated 19.1.2006 under section 11 of Offence of Zina L (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance VII of 1979, P.S. Chowk Azam, Layyah, seeks post arrest bail in the saw case, on the ground that he was arrested on 13.2.2006, was declared innocent by the D.S.P, the only allegation against him is that he gave sota blow to the injured and that his vicarious liability qua co-accused with regard to murder of Mushtaq deceased is yet to be determined after recording of evidence and that alleged recovery planted against the petitioner is fictitious.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the I complainant assisted by learned State counsel has opposed I this petition.
I 3. Without going into details, suffice it to say that I arguments advanced by learned counsel, for the petitioner I require deeper examination of the evidence which is not possible at this stage.
Although the petitioner was declared innocent by the D.S.P, yet he has been summoned by the learned Trial Court to trial. The trial has also commenced. I am therefore, not inclined to allow bail to the petitioner at this stage. This petition as such is dismissed.