Pakistan Case Law← Search
2006 PTD 286

THE STATE through Collector of Sales Tax vs MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ AHMED

Citation2006 PTD 286
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Criminal Petition No,24-K of 2004 Petition No,24-K of 2004
Date2005-07-06
Judge(s)Sayed Saeed Ashhad, M. Javed Buttar
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

' M. JAVED BUTTAR, J.---The petitioner-State, through this petition under Article 185(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment, dated 25-2-2004 passed by a learned Judge in Chambers of the High Court of Sindh, Karachi, the last paragraph of which reads as under:- "Before parting with the case, it is observed that the prosecution will be at liberty to determine the liability in respect of the sales tax and the quantum of evasion will also be calculated and after obtaining proper sanction in writing from the Federal Government against the applicants, as envisaged in subsection (3) of section 40-A of the Sales Tax Act and thereafter initiate action in accordance with law.

' Cr. Misc. No,461 of 2000 stands disposed of".

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that this Court may give a direction for the determination of the liability, as held by the High Court within a specified time and thereafter the petitioner may be declared to be at liberty to initiate prosecution, in accordance with the F.I.R.

Which was lodged by the petitioner. The learned counsel representing the respondents does not oppose the above position taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, obviously for the reason that such an order shall be in accordance with the last paragraph of the impugned judgment (reproduced above), which has not been assailed by the respondents.

3. In view of the above mentioned, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned Collector to determine the liability within the statutory period of four weeks and thereafter, the petitioner shall be at liberty to initiate prosecution against the respondents, in accordance with the F.I.R. Which already stands lodged, in accordance with law. Needless to say that as time frame has been given to the Collector concerned for the determination of the liability, no party will seek unnecessary adjournments. No order as to costs.

Cited by 5 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search