1. ' G. SAFDAR SHAH, J.-In seeking the review of the judgment of this Court, dated 10th April, 1978, Mr. Afzal Muhammad Bangash, the learned counsel for the petitioner, contended that (1) since the inception of the Kohat Municipality in 1892, Jangal Khel was being treated as a part of the aforesaid city and had lost its rural trappings ; (2) that by a judgment of the Civil Judge, Kohat, Jangal Khel was found to be an urban area ; and that (3) in view of the Notification No, 4251-LC, dated 11th June, 1954, published under the authority of the N.-W.F.P. Government, Jangal Khel was declared to be a part of the Municipal limits of the Kohat City.
2. ' His grievance therefore is that in view of the said material brought on the record of the case, the judgment delivered by this Court on 10th April, 1978 is illegal, and hence liable to be reviewed. We are afraid there is no force in this contention. Each one of the said grounds urged by the learned counsel have been elaborately dealt with in the judgment of this Court. And consequently what the learned counsel is evidently seeking is the rehearing of the case on these points which clearly lie beyond the scope of the review application. Now this being a case of pre-emption, we pointedly questioned the learned counsel to point out from the aforesaid Gazette Notification of the N.-W.F.P.
3. Government if the land in dispute did fall within the Municipal limits of Kohat City, but he .Frankly - confessed to his inability to do so, and quite rightly, because by going through the Gazette Notification in question there is nothing in it to pin-point the location of the land in dispute with any certainty to the effect whether it fell within the Municipal limits of Kohat City.
4. ' This petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed.