Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLJ 2006 SC 929

SUO MOTU CASE (CUTTING DOWN OF TREES IN JEHANGIR PARK SADDAR,

CitationPLJ 2006 SC 929
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Suo Motu Case No, 3 of 2006
Date2006-04-05
Judge(s)Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Syed Jamshed Ali, Shakirullah Jan
ResultPetition disposed of

ORDER

In pursuance of notice dated 27.3.2006, Manzoor Ahmed, EDO (Law) City Government, Karachi appeared and filed following statement on behalf of City District Government, Karachi.

"The City District Government has already written Letter to' the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh. Copy of the same produced herewith annexure "A". However, CDGK has dropped the project for construction of Parking facility on a portion of Jehangir Park due to serious reservations from the NGOs."

2. The above statement is accompanied by another letter (copy of which has been endorsed to the Chief Secretary Sindh by the City District Government, Karachi). Contents thereof are also reproduced hereinbelow:-- "Subject: Construction of Multi-Storied Car Parking Plazas on various Potential Sites of Karachi City.

The City District Government had planned for development of multi-storied car parking plazas at various potential locations in the city, in view of the serious traffic congestions being observed in the CBD Area and other arterials experiencing commercial activities resulting from the on-street parking. Under the first phase of the overall strategy the CDGK had planned for development of parking plazas at following five (05) locations:--

1. Lines Area near Saddar Dawakhana

2. Clifton near Schon Undei-pass

3. Faizi Rehman Gallery near Arts Council

4. Muhammad Community (Old Burial Ground) near Boulton Market Tonga Stand.

5. Portion of Jehangir Park (Machenzie Pavilion Ground) Saddar.

Since the parking problems is very severe in Saddar Area the City Government has already planned for development of parking facility in Lines Area Re-deVelopment project. Since this facility is not sufficient to cater for complete demand of parking, it was, therefore, planned to utilize a portion of Jehangir Park for development of multi-storied parking facility.

In view of the serious reservations from NGOs and the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme. Court of Pakistan on Suo Motu Case No 3 of 2006, the City District Government Karachi has dropped the project for construction of parking facility on a portion of Jehangir Park."

3. The representative of the City District Government explained that a portion of the Jehangir Park was ear-marked for the purpose of construction of multi-storied car parking plaza. However, in view of the order of this Court and the objections raised by other non-governmental organizations, the City District Government had decided to drop the project for construction of car parking plaza.

Mr. Naeem-ur-Rehman appeared and stated that the park is being utilized since 1893 as a public place, therefore, the City District Government had no lawful authority to convert the same for commercial purposes. Reliance was placed by him on a judgment of this Court in (C.P. No 36 of 2005). "Moulvi Iqbal Haider vs. Capital Development Authority etc." He further stated that the directions be issued to the City District Government for restoring the status of the park to its original position and it should be developed because the same is meant for the public welfare as the general public uses the same from time to time.

4. After having gone through the judgment relied upon by him and on perusing the statement filed on behalf of the City District Government, we direct that although the project has been abandoned for the reasons mentioned in the statement but City District Government is restrained to convert the same in future to any other use save in accordance with the law. However, in terms of the judgment which has been relied the City District Government is directed to restore the status of the public park and develop the same accordingly.

5. Petition stands disposed of.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search