Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
K.L.R. 2006 Criminal Cases 119

Shahbaz Hussain vs The State

CitationK.L.R. 2006 Criminal Cases 119
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No. 9017/B of 2005,
Date2006-01-16
Judge(s)Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi
ResultPre-arrest .Bail Refused

ORDER

SYED SHABBAR RAZA RIZVI, J.- The petitioner filed this application for pre-arrest bail in F:I.R. No. 231/04, dated 21.10.2004 under Sections 337-A(2)/337-F(i)/34, PPC at P.S. Laxian District Bhalwal.

2. Briefly, according to the F.I.R., complainant was attacked while he was passing through a street in front of his house by petitioner and his co-accused Azhar son of Saeed and Saeed son of Jalal. The petitioner was armed with Sota. Co-accused Saeed and petitioner caught-hold of the complainant and co-accused Azhar gave Sota blows to the complainant on his head. After a while co-accused Mumtaz and Mukhtar also armed with Sotas arrived at the place of occurrence and caused injuries with Sotas.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the case was registered mala fidley. In this context he submits that a civil suit is pending between the petitioner and one Ejaz, SI regarding the ownership of a house. He submits that the F.I.R, has been registered by said SI, Ejaz, though he was not working as a Moharrir at the time of its registration. He submits that the petitioner has been involved mala fidley in view of the above background.

4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner has been found guilty during the course of investigation. DSP (Legal) was also summoned by the Court to make statement in view of the above allegations against SI, Ejaz. The above allegation or story of mala fide has been denied by the DSP (Legal). According to the DSP (Legal), investigation has been conducted by two DSPs who could not be influenced by the said SI. According to him, the investigation was conducted fairly; justly and in accordance with law.

5. The name of the petitioner with a role is mentioned in the F.I.R. He has been found guilty by two DSPs, therefore mala fide cannot be attached and for the same reasons extra-ordinary concession of bal cannot be granted to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed and interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 7.12.2005, is recalled.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch