Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2006 MLD 178

SHABOO alias ALI KHAN vs THE STATE

Citation2006 MLD 178
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Bail Application No,383 and M.As. Nos.798, 799 of 2005
Date2005-11-07
Judge(s)Muhammad Afzal Soomro
ResultBail granted

ORDER

1. ' MUHAMMAD AFZAL SOOMRO, J.---Applicant Shaboo alias Ali Khan Shaikh seeks bail in Crime No,141 of 2001 of Police Station New Foujadari, under sections 302, 148, 149, P.P.C. On the sole ground of hardship. The bail plea of the applicant was declined by the learned IV-Additional Sessions Judge, Shikarpur vide order dated 16-3-2005.

2. ' Contentions of Mr. Jai Jai Veshnu, Advocate for the applicant, is that co-accused Abdul Rahim and Suhail Ahmed have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Bail Application No,550 of 2004, vide order dated 23-11-2004. According to him, the case of the applicant is identical to that of co- accused Abdul Rahim and Suhail Ahmed, who have been granted bail by this Court. He further contended that the applicant was arrested on 13-9-2001 and till date excepting framing of the charge in the case no further progress has been made. Referring to the case diaries placed on record, learned counsel further contended that even after the grant of bail to co-accused Abdul Rahim and Suhail Ahmed, the prosecution has failed to produce any witness. He, therefore, urged that it is a fit case, where the applicant has to be enlarged on bail on the ground of hardship as well as on the principle of rule of consistency.

3. ' Learned State counsel in view of the above legal position raised no objection to the grant of bail.

4. I have considered the contentions of the learned counsel and perused the record including the case diaries. The record reveals that the applicant after his arrest on 13-9-2001 has remained in continuous custody without any progress. Only the charge has been framed in the case. The perusal of case diaries reveals that even after grant of bail to co-accused by this Court the prosecution has not been able to produce a single witness. Such a conduct on the part of the prosecution is shocking and it is settled law that no one can be detained in jail for indefinite period.

5. ' In the circumstances, I have come to the conclusion that the applicant has been able to make out a case for bail, which is granted. The applicant be released on bail provided he furnishes surety in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

6. ' Criminal Bail Application No,S-383 of 2005 stands disposed of along with listed application.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch