' The learned Advocate Supreme Court submits that the petitioners had not been sent to the Court premises for maintenance of law and order and had gone there merely to arrest some accused person who had moved a petition for his release on pre-arrest bail. This submission is being negated by the record according to which the petitioners had been sent to the Court premises for "Urdu".
2. Be that as it may, it is not permissible for us to resolve factual controversies in this jurisdiction envisaged by Article 212(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. It had been found by the learned Service Tribunal that the petitioners had ample opportunity to defend their jobs before the competent forum seized of the matter during the course of disciplinary proceedings and no illegality existed vis-a-vis the said proceedings. The learned counsel has not been able to show the existence of any substantial question of law of great public importance which could justify grant of leave to the petitioners to file appeals.
3. Civil Petitions Nos.2738-L of 2004 to 2745-L of 2004 are therefore, dismissed. Leave refused.