1. ' MAULVI ANWARUL HAQ, J.---States at the bar that real grievance rather apprehension of the petitioner is that for no fault of her's she may have lost her last chance to clear her English Paper of B.Ed. An examination of the writ petition and the accompanying documents reveals that the petitioner had filed her forms and the requisite charges in time. According to the letter dated 24-2- 2005 of the respondent-University her roll number and date sheet were put in the postal process on 28-1-2005 but the postal authorities delivered the letter to the petitioner on 8-2-2005. I further find that the respondent-University itself has lodged a protest with the postal Department on its said negligence. In the said state of affairs apparent on the face of the records, apprehension of the learned counsel appears to be rather misplaced. It is but evident that neither the petitioner nor the University is to be blamed but at the same time for the misdeeds of the postal authorities the petitioner by no stretch of imagination can be said to have lost her last chance to clear the said English Paper of B.Ed. The only dispute left is with regard to the fee which, according to the University, is not refundable. This will be a subject-matter of some appropriate proceedings. The petitioner may, therefore, subject to deposit of charges and reserving her right to proceed against the concerned responsible person, appear in the said English Paper.
2. ' With these observations, writ petition is disposed of. Copy of this order to be remitted to the respondent-University immediately, by the office.