' Consequent upon rejection of the petitioner's Writ Petition No,3688 of 2004 by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench grudging against construction of within mentioned bridge, I.C.A. No,77 of 2004 was recoursed which met with the same fate vide the impugned order dated 30-11-2004, observing:-- "This I.C.A. Is directed against the order dated 4-11-2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in Chamber whereby Writ Petition No,3688 of 2004 filed by the appellant challenging the letter dated 14-10-2004 issued by the Minister for Ushr and Zakat, Government of Punjab, for changing the venue of construction of a bridge, was dismissed.
(2) Arguments heard. Record perused.
(3) The construction of the project in question at its present place was commenced prior to issuance of the letter of the Minister for Ushr and Zakat; a substantial work has already been done; learned counsel failed to pinpoint any loss which may accrue if the construction of bridge at its present place is completed; even no vested right of the appellant was pinpointed, in fringement of which may give rise to a cause of action to be agitated through a Constitutional petition.
(4) A perusal of the impugned order shows that the same has been passed by the learned Single Judge after having considered the various pros and cons of the matter in issue and no exception with regard thereto can be taken in this I.C.A. Which stands dismissed in limine."
' Has sought leave to appeal reiterating the submission.
2. Which we are afraid is misconceived because the same has been exhaustively dealt with by the.
Learned I.C.A. Bench as well as the learned Single Judge of the High Court. Resultantly, the same fails and is hereby dismissed. Leave declined.