' MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J, --- After throught the going original record, I am inclined toproceed further against Dr. Mansoor Tariq.
2. Muhammad Akram Shahzad and Muhammad Usman have sought post-arrest bail in case. F.I.R.
No, 99 registered at Police Station City, Khanpur on 14-3-2005 for offences under Articles 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979.
3. As per F.I.R., on secret information, the petitioners were apprehended by Hafeez Ahmad, A.S.-I./ complainant. During search, 300 Kuppis (small containers) of liquor were recovered from the possession of the petitioners and the case was registered against them.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant record of the case.
5. It has been noticed that the provisions of section 103, Cr.P.C. Have been violated with impunity by the complainant/A.S.-I; that the offences do not attract the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
And that no record is available against the petitioners that they A were not previously involved in any criminal case. In the circumstances, I am inclined to admit the petitioners to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of rupees fifty thousand each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.