1. ' SYED ZAHID HUSSAIN, J.---A complaint filed by the petitioner before the Wafaqi Mohtasib, was accepted on 4-9-2004 with certain recommendations. Qua the same, a representation under Article 32 of President Order No,1 of 1983 was filed by the respondent/ agency, which was accepted by respondent No,1, vide communication dated 26-5-2005. The petitioner seems to have filed a review petition before respondent No, 1, which was dismissed that the same was not maintainable.
2. This was vide communication dated 30-9-2005. These orders are sought to be assailed through this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 by her.
3. ' Although parawise comments have been filed by the respondents yet the petitioner is not represented.
4. ' The contention of the learned Standing Counsel for Pakistan Railways has substance that the Departmental penalty imposed upon the deceased i,e, the husband of the petitioner has remained intact till date as the same was never challenged and that the acquittal from the criminal case does not automatically obliterate the same. Insofar as the grievance of the petitioner that the order passed by respondent No,1, was without hearing is concerned, he relies upon Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Education, Islamabad v. Professor Dr. Anwar and 2 others (2006 SCM R 382) to contend that the hearing was not necessary and if the order is passed which contains reasons for the acceptance of the representation after considering comments/reply, no fault can be attributed to the same. The legal position stated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan binds everyone including this court and is to be honoured.
5. ' In such view of the matter the petition is dismissed accordingly.